Sony's Reeves "Surprised" That People Buy PS3?

80GB PS3 is unnecessary

13 Jul 2007

Following Sony's PS3 bundle announcement (which SPOnG broke on Wednesday) David Reeves, president of Sony Computer Entertainment Europe, has expressed surprise that people are buying the PlayStation 3 at the £425 price tag it’s had since launch.

Surprise Purchase
Responding to a question about whether – regardless of what's included - £425 is perceived as just too much for a console, Reeves said “It is, but surprisingly, people are paying that amount of money for it.”

Cheap Storage
He then proceeded, flippantly, to dismiss the fact that we might have liked the extra 20Gb of hard disk space that the U.S. is getting with the 80Gb PS3.
“The difference between 60GB and 80GB is not really necessary. The difference in cost between a 60 and 80 is just Euro cents; it's nothing, because the cost of memory is so small.”


Basically, then, the extra 20GB of memory is unnecessary because it's so cheap to include?

Justification
Reeves then attempted to justify his decision, saying,
“Probably we could have gone for 80GB, but does it really make any difference? We just know that we get a better supply on the 60GB than we will on the 80GB. So, we chose to continue with the 60GB until we find that we can get something better, maybe lower cost. It just didn't seem necessary to us.”


Bearing in mind the minuscule price difference between the two different-sized SATA drives and the fact that Sony's production process wouldn't be altered by its inclusion, SPOnG fails to see why supply of the 60GB model should be any more plentiful than that of the 80GB.
\ advertisement /

/ advertisement \


Emotion Envy
The reason the U.S. is getting a better model, Reeves explains, is because its PS3 was better to start with – although he doesn’t mention to Emotion Engine Chip by name.
“The difference is that the 60GB we have now has about 88 per cent backwards compatibility. The 60GB they had had 100 per cent backwards compatibility. They felt that by going down for 100 to 88, for example, that they'd have to add something in - and that's what they did.”


On PSP
On to the PSP, asked about the recent ‘redesign’, Reeves says, “It's setting itself up. It needed to be lighter and slimmer to make it portable. To solve the problem, if there is a problem with PSP, is to have better and more original games.”

Yes, we read, “To make it portable” as well…

Nintendo
Surprisingly, Reeves heaps praise on Nintendo’s role in the industry over the last two years, saying:
“We owe a debt to Nintendo for keeping the industry going in the last couple of years; they're the ones who have kept it going.”


It's funny, but SPOnG could have sworn that it was Sony's own PS2 that's been keeping the games industry going for the last few years. If SCEE's president tells us otherwise, however, who are we to argue?

No PlayStation 4
Maintaining Sony's standard line on the PS3’s lifespan, Reeves says he expects ten years out of it. Its replacement, however, might come before then and won't be a PS4 apparently. “I don't think it will be a PlayStation 4; it will be something completely different” Reeves said.

Dead U.S. PS3
Reeves also confirmed what SPOnG told you on Tuesday: the 60Gb PS3 is on its way out in the US. “All they're doing is taking their stock in trade that they've got at the moment of the 60GB model, marking the price down and it will all be gone by the end of July”, Reeves said.

See the full interview here.

Share this item on... N4G digg Slashdot NewsVine del.icio.us Reddit Fark RSS News Feed JavaScript News Gadget Google Gadget



Comments


5 comments posted.

First comment

Posted by ultimateassmonkey
I've heard some are fuming over the 60gig model being on its way out. They were really pissed!

But anyway, as I have been saying... Sony could have priced the ps3 at £500 (or even more) and people would still have bought it!!

"Surprised?" You knew you could get away with it Sony... Don't act all surprised for nothing... You'll be pissing a load of people off due to being "surprised"

Latest comment

Posted by config
Joji wrote:
Backwards compatibility is not freaking rocket science either.


ZOMG, Joji. I think you might have just set the new standard for "most clueless comment"

Post Your Own

Quick sign-in Forgotten your password?
Don't go posting anonymously! Log-in or register for the unadulterated experience

(Go on, give it a check through)
Humans Rule OK
Show us that you're not an evil robot that's going turn us into dodgy meds junkies. Enter the letters, numbers and symbols shown on the left in to the box below.

Companies


People


Competitions


There are no competitions running right now.

If you've entered one of our recent competitions, then check out the winners

Polls


Cut Scenes: Art or Sheer Bloody Laziness?


See Results | See All Polls


. . .