Mario Party 8 Pulled For Offensive Content
Time for game translators to get their acts together

16 Jul 2007
Mario Party 8, which was only released on Friday, has been pulled from U.K. retail for what is being termed as offensive language: yet another 'spastic' reference.
In an announcement on its website Nintendo states, “Unfortunately we have discovered that a small number of games contain the wrong version of the disk due to an assembly error. We have therefore decided to recall all copies of the game from UK retailers so that this mistake can be corrected.”
What it does not state, however, is that the “wrong version” contains the words, "Magikoopa magic! Turn the train spastic! Make this ticket tragic!”
We've not played the game to this level as yet, so we don't know whether or not the train in question does actually exhibit spasticity. If so, then it's fair enough of course.
The word no doubt found its way into the game in the translation from Japanese to English. SPOnG contacted Nintendo to find out how such an error could have slipped through quality assurance and what's being done to ensure the mistake isn't repeated, but no comment was available at the time of press.
This comes just a couple of weeks after Ubisoft's Mind Quiz was pulled from retail for containing the phrase 'Super Spastic'. Frankly, SPOnG's unimpressed by the word finding its way into two games in one month. We certainly expect better from a AAA release from Nintendo.
It makes us miss the days when the type of mistranslation that slipped through the QA net was the likes of 'Japlish' phrase, "Your fists of evil are about to meet my steel wall of niceness", in Fatal Fury Special.
A spokesperson from national disability charity, Scope, commented to SPOnG, "Although this term might not be as offensive everywhere as it is here in the UK, there is no excuse for releasing a game in this country including this word. Many disabled people and their families will have taken offence at this.
"Games such as these have a wide-reaching impact, often spanning international communities, and it is important that they are universally acceptable, inclusive and not offensive.
"Scope would like to make it clear that language such as this is not acceptable, it is divisive - especially where it is repeated within communities - and it is considered by many to be extremely offensive. Computer game manufacturers should take steps to monitor the use of language in their games more closely in future."
As for the future of Mario Party 8, Nintendo says, "We will re-launch Mario Party 8 in the U.K. as soon as possible and will announce a new launch date shortly. We very much regret any inconvenience caused."
Political Correctness gone mad? Or lazy, offensive corporate cruelty? Tell us in the Forum.
Share this item on...
Comments >>
Related Images
Latest News
Comments
15 comments posted.
First comment
Posted by irritant
Hmm. I wonder when someone's going to spot that the UK release of Elite Beat Agents on DS also has an "offensive" word left in from the US version. One of the characters in the cutscenes for the "Red Carpet Premiere" mission is called "Mr Fanny" (as he was in the US version released oh so long ago).
This begs the question why us UK folks are made to wait 8 months for a game to be "localised" from the US version when they don't make a single change. In the case of Elite Beat it's not even the case that the cart is multi-language, either - there's a different cart per European territory, so why don't they just launch the English language versions of games worldwide at the same time and make the countries that aren't thoughtful enough to speak English do all the waiting?
This begs the question why us UK folks are made to wait 8 months for a game to be "localised" from the US version when they don't make a single change. In the case of Elite Beat it's not even the case that the cart is multi-language, either - there's a different cart per European territory, so why don't they just launch the English language versions of games worldwide at the same time and make the countries that aren't thoughtful enough to speak English do all the waiting?
Latest comment
Posted by realvictory
In this game, the word is accurate in its meaning, without intrinsically having to have an offensive meaning (because it has more than one meaning). If, on the other hand, it was a swear word, or something whose only meaning is only offensive, fair enough, but what I don't like is that they're telling the people who said the word what they meant by it, which isn't right. We're talking about a train, not about a person, therefore I don't see how cerebal palsy can even apply.
I find certain types of speech offensive, too, but I don't have the right to change the way people speak or what people say just because I personally happen to find it offensive. The point is, in this case, (a) it's subjective as to whether or not it is interpreted as being offensive (the word has more than one meaning), (b) it is not meant in an offensive way.
There are lots of other circumstances that are on the borderline of being offensive (such as topics of homosexuality, death) which are even harder to avoid. Although that isn't the case with this game, some people will find certain subjects offensive, but many won't, but how many people must find something offensive before it is classed as being offensive? One person? One hundred people? I still think the key is that it wasn't used in the right context to be classed as being offensive.
Still, they made sure that it would offend no one by recalling it, which is the best option, when you don't want to offend anyone.
I find certain types of speech offensive, too, but I don't have the right to change the way people speak or what people say just because I personally happen to find it offensive. The point is, in this case, (a) it's subjective as to whether or not it is interpreted as being offensive (the word has more than one meaning), (b) it is not meant in an offensive way.
There are lots of other circumstances that are on the borderline of being offensive (such as topics of homosexuality, death) which are even harder to avoid. Although that isn't the case with this game, some people will find certain subjects offensive, but many won't, but how many people must find something offensive before it is classed as being offensive? One person? One hundred people? I still think the key is that it wasn't used in the right context to be classed as being offensive.
Still, they made sure that it would offend no one by recalling it, which is the best option, when you don't want to offend anyone.
Post Your Own
Companies
Games
Polls
Related News
Latest Features
| Feature// SPOnG's Review of 2008: August |
| Feature// SPOnG's Review of 2008: July |
| Feature// SPOnG's Review of 2008: June |
| Interview// Jacob Minkoff - Lead Designer - Damnation |
| Feature// SPOnG's Review of 2008: May |
| Feature// SPOnG's Review of 2008: April |
| Feature// SPOnG's Review of 2008: March |
| Feature// SPOnG's Review of 2008: February |
| Feature// SPOnG's Review of 2008: January |
| Opinion// Lich King Screwed Up Warcraft |




