Sony: Developers Face Tough Platform Choice

Easy ports a thing of the past

Posted 26 Jul 2007
Follow us on... Facebook Twitter iGoogle RSS
Share on... Twitter N4G digg Facebook Slashdot
Easy multi-platform ports of games are a thing of the past, according to Sony's head of worldwide studios, Phil Harrison.

Speaking in an interview with MCV, Harrison said “Development and support for a format is very important yes, and the story is very different these days to how it was with older formats. In the past you could pay a million dollars for a PS2 game and get a $50,000 Xbox port thrown in. Those days are gone. Developers have to pick their formats much more carefully.

“This is partly because of the huge cost of development. But it’s not just a financial consideration. It’s about strategic marketing and the online consumer. It’s about how a game fits its format.”

Harrison's words have a faintly ominous ring when taken in context with some other comments he's made about platform exclusives. Earlier in the month Harrison was boasting that Sony has the largest “platform-dedicated development resource” out of the platform holders. Is that because he doesn't expect third parties to see the PS3 as the most viable platform for their games? Answers in the Forum, please.

However, the current trend towards making platform agnostic titles that once would have been platform exclusives seems to cast doubt on the accuracy of Harrison's statement. GTA IV, anyone?

Source: MCV

Comments

Spammer? All posted links are "nofollow", every spam post is edited or nuked.

Humans Rule OK

1/9
haritori posted on 26 Jul 2007 18:19
i think with gtaIV that rockstar saw how the exclusivity sold very well on ps2 but then went on later to continue to sell very well on xbox and in this generation a realisation that no one platform is the winner anymore, i think we will see both 360 and PS3 both competing all through there life and no definitive winner will really be shown, the Wii is where majority of consumers will go and then pick a 360 or PS3 to go along that for more traditional gaming.
2/9
Pat the Cat posted on 27 Jul 2007 12:22
"“This is partly because of the huge cost of development. But it’s not just a financial consideration. It’s about strategic marketing and the online consumer. It’s about how a game fits its format.”

Bullshit. It's about the fact that it's a lot harder to get PS3 to emulate Xbox 360 and vice-versa.

Used to be the the case, if a game ran on PS2 it would work on pretty much any platform.
more comments below our sponsor's message
3/9
PreciousRoi posted on 27 Jul 2007 12:42
what an arrogant cock...$50,000 Xbox port indeed...

Used to be the case, developers could get away with porting a game from an inferior console over to Xbox...
4/9
Rutabaga posted on 27 Jul 2007 13:09
PreciousRoi wrote:

Used to be the case, developers could get away with porting a game from an inferior console over to Xbox...

Yeh man too true, Except this generation they cant get away with porting from an inferior console to the PS3. It requires more work.
5/9
PreciousRoi posted on 27 Jul 2007 13:46
somehow I don't think porting from the Wii will be much of an issue...

lets just leave it at that shall we?
6/9
haritori posted on 27 Jul 2007 13:48
PreciousRoi wrote:
somehow I don't think porting from the Wii will be much of an issue...

lets just leave it at that shall we?


graphically no, but i somehow think cooking mama might not be as fun!
7/9
Rutabaga posted on 27 Jul 2007 14:07
PreciousRoi wrote:
somehow I don't think porting from the Wii will be much of an issue...

lets just leave it at that shall we?


I was more referring to the 360.
8/9
PreciousRoi posted on 27 Jul 2007 14:17
really? I had no idea...

take the hint...
9/9
Rutabaga posted on 27 Jul 2007 15:59
PreciousRoi wrote:
really? I had no idea...

take the hint...

I don't understand...?

Polls

Online Multiplayer or Not for you?


Results | All Polls

. . .