Sony's Hirai: We Won't Promote PS2 Games

End of the road for PS2 support?

Kz Hirai, president of SCE
22 Jan 2008

Kaz Hirai, president and CEO of Sony Computer Entertainment (SCE), has raised some interesting questions regarding his company's strategy regarding PS3 backward compatibility and the future of PS2 gaming.

Speaking to Bloomberg, Hirai said, "We want to promote games only available for PlayStation 3. The introduction of the 40-gigabyte model is in line with that strategy".

This stays very much on-message with statements made late last year by Sony Computer Entertainment (UK) managing director Ray Maguire who told SPOnG, "When we launched, we said we would focus on forward production than backwards-compatibility, but there was more of a need for backwards-compatibility six months ago. So, from here on in, there are no plans for backwards-compatibility in PlayStation products."

Before the crashing tedium of fanboy ranting begins elsewhere, let's analyse the statement:

Hirai did not say, "We only want to promote games available for PlayStation 3".

So, don't read this as "We won't promote non-exclusives". It would be insane for Sony not to co-promote non-exclusives such as Assassin's Creed or Smackdown vs Raw, which would help sell hardware.
\ advertisement /

/ advertisement \


What this re-statement of intent is more likely to mean is that days of the PlayStation 2 are well and truly numbered.

At this point, we'd like to remind you of Kaz's assertion that, "The introduction of the 40-gigabyte model is in line with that strategy.''

One of the most notable missing features of the 40GB PS3 is its lack of backwards compatibility. Doesn't it appear counter-intuitive to drop backwards compatibility and also pull support from PS2 itself?
Not if Sony plans to shift its focus with regard to PS2 games towards making them available over the PlayStation Network as legacy titles, or 'PlayStation Originals'?

That is, of course, a bit of a stretch - but it remains a possibility nonetheless. A possibility that could be supported by a recently spotted job vacancy for someone to work on PS3 backwards compatibility, in spite of the fact that Sony's most prevalent PS3 model has none.

Let us know your thoughts in the Forum.

Source: Bloomberg
Share this item on... N4G digg Slashdot NewsVine del.icio.us Reddit Fark RSS News Feed JavaScript News Gadget Google Gadget



Comments


12 comments posted.

First comment

Posted by haritori
Its a bit silly, really isnt it the PS2 is still shoveling money in for sony so why turn your back on it, the PSOne continued to make money for years after the PS2, Just because PS3 sales arent all that, it doesnt mean they wont be and in effect they are focusing all there attention on somthing that isnt making money and cutting ties with what is? confused? i am?

Latest comment

Posted by Ivan_PSP
The 40GB PLAYSTATION 3 is backward compatible with PS1 games but not PS2. Anyways the entire planet still has a bunch of PS2s.

Post Your Own

Quick sign-in Forgotten your password?
Don't go posting anonymously! Log-in or register for the unadulterated experience

(Go on, give it a check through)
Humans Rule OK
Show us that you're not an evil robot that's going turn us into dodgy meds junkies. Enter the letters, numbers and symbols shown on the left in to the box below.

Companies


People


Competitions


There are no competitions running right now.

If you've entered one of our recent competitions, then check out the winners

Polls


Cut Scenes: Art or Sheer Bloody Laziness?


See Results | See All Polls


. . .