Microsoft: Vista Follow-Up Name 'Just Makes Sense'

Yes! It's another naming convention!

14 Oct 2008

Okay, so maybe Vista wasn't the most fantastic of operating systems ever to invade your PC (the least fantastic being ME) but now the Steve Balmer-lead Microsoft is already talking follow-up. In this blog, Corporate VP, Windows Product Managemet (sic), Mike Nash gives the reasons for the new name.

"The decision to use the name Windows 7 is about simplicity.

"Over the years, we have taken different approaches to naming Windows. We've used version numbers like Windows 3.11, or dates like Windows 98, or 'aspirational' monikers like Windows XP or Windows Vista.

"And since we do not ship new versions of Windows every year, using a date did not make sense. Likewise, coming up with an all-new 'aspirational' name does not do justice to what we are trying to achieve, which is to stay firmly rooted in our aspirations for Windows Vista, while evolving and refining the substantial investments in platform technology in Windows Vista into the next generation of Windows.
\ advertisement /

/ advertisement \


Simply put, this is the seventh release of Windows, so therefore 'Windows 7' just makes sense."

Riiiight, so Windows 7 is not aspirational although it does "stay firmly rooted in our aspirations". And unlike the datey versions, it "makes sense". Phew.

You'll be able to find out more about the O/S, "In a few weeks", when "we are going to be talking about the details of this release at the PDC and at WinHEC. We will be sharing a pre-beta "developer only release" with attendees of both shows and giving them the first broad in-depth look at what we've been up to. I can't wait for them to see it."

Huzza! Time to start investing in RAM and GFX cards maybe?

Full spiel is here.
Share this item on... N4G digg Slashdot NewsVine del.icio.us Reddit Fark RSS News Feed JavaScript News Gadget Google Gadget



Comments

8 comments posted.

First comment

Posted by SuperSaiyan4
The only issue I have with Vista is the amount of memory it needs i.e. 2gb is required for a 32bit Vista and 4gb for 64bit! I am running 64bit with 2gb which is the minimum requirement although have not had any issues with it at all to be honest.

Latest comment

Posted by phil cort
SuperSaiyan4 wrote:
Well its not like there are other operating systems out there that are compatible with the large range of software on the market that is PC only like games for example. Mac OS is not compatble with most of the stuff on the market and I dont see anyone else making an operating system for the PC that is well known enough to get support its only Windows.

think you on one of your have not got it must be shit things if you go and look at games for mac there you will see that most of the big pc titles are all so for mac just looking at the list heres some call of duty 4, spore, wow, Enemy Territory: QUAKE Wars, sims, Guitar Hero 3 just to name some but hay why dont you go back to you hole to think up some more shit that over rates microsoft

Post Your Own


(Go on, give it a check through)
Humans Rule OK
Show us that you're not an evil robot that's going turn us into dodgy meds junkies. Enter the letters, numbers and symbols shown on the left in to the box below.

Companies

Competitions

There are no competitions running right now.

If you've entered one of our recent competitions, then check out the winners

Polls

As a games year, 2008 has been...


See Results | See All Polls

Latest Features

Review// Lips3|Dec
Review// Far Cry 227|Nov
Review// Skate it26|Nov
Interview// Mortal Kombat vs DC Universe: Senior Producer, Hans Lo25|Nov
Review// Tomb Raider: Underworld (PS3)25|Nov
Review// Mortal Kombat vs DC Universe24|Nov
Review// Shaun White Snowboarding: Road Trip19|Nov
Review// Mirror's Edge14|Nov
Review// LocoRoco 2 (PSP)14|Nov
Review// Call of Duty: World at War14|Nov


. . .