PS3 Slim Confirmed? Lawyers Demand SPOnG Removes Pix
> News Comments > SPOnG Comments Index
Topic started: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:37
Click here to view the news article this topic refers to.
Click here to view the news article this topic refers to.
Mon, 18 May 2009 12:37
Mog wrote:
@haritori
No I completely agree with you, the second these pictures hit the public domain they became public, LevelUp placed them up, as far as it seems they would be the first.
Spong has done nothing wrong, but wish them good luck either ways, these things can always turn sour very easily.
No I completely agree with you, the second these pictures hit the public domain they became public, LevelUp placed them up, as far as it seems they would be the first.
Spong has done nothing wrong, but wish them good luck either ways, these things can always turn sour very easily.
Cheers guys! YOu might also like to see: http://news.spong.com/article/17950/PS3_Slim_-_More_Pix_from_Torn_Site
A different story entirely from the same day.
Cheers
Tim
PS: anybody got a good cure for stomach-wrenching nightmare bugs?
Mon, 18 May 2009 12:39
@frog
Aye, but is it Sony who is behind it?
This will all be pretty interesting to see now, previously I would have thought nothing of it because that unit looks really shoddy, lol
It will be interesting to see what happens with this thing, or if it falls completely silent
But to be honest Spong did do something silly though, did you notice the "keep our request confidential", lol. Don't think there is any rule against actually doing that though, its more of a request than an order, no real Law to prevent it.
Aye, but is it Sony who is behind it?
This will all be pretty interesting to see now, previously I would have thought nothing of it because that unit looks really shoddy, lol
It will be interesting to see what happens with this thing, or if it falls completely silent
But to be honest Spong did do something silly though, did you notice the "keep our request confidential", lol. Don't think there is any rule against actually doing that though, its more of a request than an order, no real Law to prevent it.
Mon, 18 May 2009 12:41
This whole article is b******s.
Mon, 18 May 2009 12:41
@Tim
Whiskey, drop of boiling water, squeeze of lemon juice and add in some honey, stirr and drink. You will be feeling better in no time ^^
PS- I did find the corrent law firm eventually xD
Whiskey, drop of boiling water, squeeze of lemon juice and add in some honey, stirr and drink. You will be feeling better in no time ^^
PS- I did find the corrent law firm eventually xD
Mon, 18 May 2009 12:44
This link threw me off about you pulling down your pics:
***n00b weblink removed***
***n00b weblink removed***
Mon, 18 May 2009 12:50
Mog wrote:
@Tim
Whiskey, drop of boiling water, squeeze of lemon juice and add in some honey, stirr and drink. You will be feeling better in no time ^^
PS- I did find the corrent law firm eventually xD
Whiskey, drop of boiling water, squeeze of lemon juice and add in some honey, stirr and drink. You will be feeling better in no time ^^
PS- I did find the corrent law firm eventually xD
Nice one Mog, cheers for that.
Tim
Mon, 18 May 2009 12:55
frog wrote:
the right way to address a rumour is the engage us and outlets, not get all legal on our asses
Absolutely. This is one reason I'm sure that Sony isn't in this particular loop. They would most certainly have simply let the tale die or issued a "It's simply rumour and speculation".
frog wrote:
whatever happened to the "relations" bit of pr?
Still bubbling away. In fact, according to a recent 'debate' PR and journalists are all just the same, but different sides of the same coin. Ahhh, lovely.
Me arse.
Cheers
Tim
Mon, 18 May 2009 13:39
Oh yeah, that sounds like it's really written by a real lawyer. "which were highly possibly illegally released". Who wrote that line, a 5 year old? It's not even proper english.
Mon, 18 May 2009 14:07
@lol Oo! Oo! I can deflect that one! English isn't the issuing lawyer's mother tongue.
Mon, 18 May 2009 15:17
If its legit, sounds like someone is worried.
We could do with a PS3 Slim, I'd perhaps buy one then.
We could do with a PS3 Slim, I'd perhaps buy one then.
Mon, 18 May 2009 16:11
damn. i agree, when someone gets the lawyers involved it usually means s**t is real. i thought it was fake though. craziness.
Mon, 18 May 2009 16:19
KADARE wrote:
damn. i agree, when someone gets the lawyers involved it usually means s**t is real. i thought it was fake though. craziness.
Never fear - there are some genuine fakes over here...
cheers
Tim
Mon, 18 May 2009 16:48
I think it's silly to assume the latter to be false just because some hired a lawyer it's perfectly reasonable to assume that a company which was producing knockoffs panicked and tried to hush you before this got Sony's full attention.
Tue, 19 May 2009 03:26
It's pretty simple isn't it? This is a cheap knock-off product (trust me these things are all over SE and E Asia--I remember seeing a "Super PolyStation 2" that looked just like a PS2 until you realised that you had to 'pop' the hood and play cartridge games). These guys are probably trying to quash the media frenzy lest they suffer the wrath of Sony's lawyers.
I mean, I find it really unlikely that this is the PS3 Slim.
I mean, I find it really unlikely that this is the PS3 Slim.
Log-in or register to permanently change your layout setting.
1783 comments
What do you mean "back"?
http://news.spong.com/article/17950/PS3_Slim_-_More_Pix_from_Torn_Site
Different story...
Here is the link to Li Mo & Associates web page:
http://www.lirulaw.com/en/aboutUs.html
Wrong set of lawyers, mate.
Nope - and we didn't say that... I reckon it's the Fab in China or Taiwan.
We currently are - aside from me, I've been in and out of the lav' all day with some stomach bug. I like to share info.
Cheers
Tim